4 min read
In today's notes on CCPA compliance, Dashlane gets the award for passive aggressive whinging paired with a dark pattern designed to obscure consent. I have managed to get my hands on secret video of Dashlane's team while they were planning how to structure their opt out page. This completely legitimate video is included below.
Hidden camera video of the design process for Dashlane's opt out page.
In case you've never heard of Dashlane, they are a password manager. Three alternatives that are all less whingy are 1Password, LastPass, and KeePassXC -- and KeePassXC is an open source option.
Dashlane appears to be preparing for California's privacy law, CCPA, which is set to go into effect in 2020.
The screenshot below is from Dashlane's spash page where, under CCPA, they are required to allow California residents to opt out of having their data sold. CCPA has a reasonably broad definition of what selling data means, and, predictably, some companies are upset at having any limits placed on their ability to use the data they have collected or accumulated.
Dashlane's disclaimer and opt out page provides a good example of how a company can comply, yet exhibit bad faith in the process.
First, let's look at their description of sales as defined by CCPA:
However, the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), defines “sale” very broadly, and it likely includes transfers of information related to advertising cookies.
Two thoughts come to mind nearly simultaneously: this is cute, and stop whining. Companies have used a range of jargon to define commercial transfers of data for years - for example, "sharing" with "affiliates", or custom definitions of what constitutes PII, or shell games with cookies that are mapped between vendors and/or mapped to a browser or device profile. It's also worth noting that Dashlane is theoretically a company that helps people maintain better privacy and security practice via centralized password management. It's hard to imagine a better example of a company that should look to exceed the basic ground level requirements of privacy laws. Instead, Dashlane appears to be whinging about it.
However, Dashlane does more than just whine about CCPA. They take the extra step of burying their opt out in a multilayered dark pattern, complete with unclear "help" text and labels.
As shown in the above screenshot, Dashlane's text instructs people to make a selection in "the box below". However, two obvious problems immediately become clear. First, there is no box, below or otherwise - the splash page contains a toggle and a submit button.
Second, assuming that the toggle is what they mean by "box", we have two options: "active" or "inactive." It's not clear what option turns cookies "off" - does the "active" setting means that we have activated enhanced privacy protections, or does the "active" setting means that ad tracking is activated? This is a pretty clear example of a dark pattern, or a design pattern that intentionally misleads or confusers end users.
Based on additional language on the splash page, it looks like the confusion that Dashlane has created is pretty meaningless because anything we set on this page appears pretty easy to wipe out, either intentionally or accidentally. So, even if the user makes the wrong choice because the language is intentionally confusing, this vague choice can get erased pretty easily.
Based on this description, the ad tracking opt out sounds like it's cookie based, and therefore brittle to the point of meaningless.
While it remains to be seen how other companies will address their obligations under CCPA, I'd like to congratulate Dashlane on taking an early lead in the "toothless compliance" and "aggressive whinging" categories.